From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 65223 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2018 13:10:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 65180 invoked by uid 89); 21 Aug 2018 13:10:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HTo:D*be, personal X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:10:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BED5116517; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:10:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GXvgS1X2m5eA; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:10:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E6E116417; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:10:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3009F82CB2; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 06:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:10:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Philippe Waroquiers Cc: Andrew Burgess , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/2] gdb: Change how frames are selected for 'frame' and 'info frame'. Message-ID: <20180821131034.GA24065@adacore.com> References: <20180725181406.GA3155@embecosm.com> <1534242709.15655.4.camel@skynet.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1534242709.15655.4.camel@skynet.be> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-SW-Source: 2018-08/txt/msg00479.txt.bz2 > What I find confusing is to have the same concept > ('frame something_identifying_a_frame') > be called sometimes 'frame number' and sometimes 'frame level'. > > My personal preference is to use 'frame level' because: FWIW, that is my preference as well. -- Joel