Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: nd@arm.com,	Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] infcall-nested-structs: Test up to five fields
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 09:30:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180820092933.83224-5-alan.hayward@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180820092933.83224-1-alan.hayward@arm.com>

Aarch64 can pass structures of up to four members of identical
types in float registers (See AAPCS 5.3 and 5.4). Expand test to
cover this.

Remove the need to specify an additional sets of structures if tB
is not defined.

2018-08-20  Alan Hayward  <alan.hayward@arm.com>

gdb/testsuite/
	* gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.c (struct struct01): Remove.
	(struct struct02): Likewise.
	(struct struct03): Likewise.
	(struct struct04): Likewise.
	(struct struct_01_01): New struct.
	(struct struct_01_02): Likewise.
	(struct struct_01_03): Likewise.
	(struct struct_01_04): Likewise.
	(struct struct_02_01): Likewise.
	(struct struct_02_02): Likewise.
	(struct struct_02_03): Likewise.
	(struct struct_02_04): Likewise.
	(struct struct_04_01): Likewise.
	(struct struct_04_02): Likewise.
	(struct struct_04_03): Likewise.
	(struct struct_04_04): Likewise.
	(struct struct_05_01): Likewise.
	(struct struct_05_02): Likewise.
	(struct struct_05_03): Likewise.
	(struct struct_05_04): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct01): Remove function.
	(cmp_struct02): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct03): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct04): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct_01_01): Add Function.
	(cmp_struct_01_02): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct_01_03): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct_01_04): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct_02_01): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct_02_02): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct_02_03): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct_02_04): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct_04_01): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct_04_02): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct_04_03): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct_04_04): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct_05_01): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct_05_02): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct_05_03): Likewise.
	(cmp_struct_05_04): Likewise.
	(call_all): Add new structs.
	* gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.exp: Likewise.
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.c   | 168 ++++++++++++++++------
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.exp |   5 +-
 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.c
index f024ac6163..01863cca80 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.c
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.c
@@ -17,13 +17,13 @@
 
 /* This file is used for testing GDBs ability to pass structures to, and
    return structures from, functions.  All of the structures in this test
-   are special in that they are small structures containing only 1 or 2
+   are special in that they are small structures containing from 1 up to 5
    scalar fields, the fields can be inside nested structures, and there can
    be empty structures around too.
 
-   This test was originally written for RiscV which has some special ABI
-   rules for structures like these, however, there should be no harm in
-   running these tests on other targets, though in many cases the
+   This test is specifically written for RiscV and Aarch64, which both have
+   special ABI rules for structures like these, however, there should be no harm
+   in running these tests on other targets, though in many cases the
    structures will treated no differently to the structures already covered
    in the structs.exp test script.  */
 
@@ -61,69 +61,133 @@ typedef long double _Complex tldc;
 #define REF_VAL(NAME) struct NAME ref_val_ ## NAME
 #define ES(NAME) struct { } NAME
 
+/* Test is either for a single type or two differing types.  */
 #if defined tA && ! defined tB
+#define tB tA
+#endif
+#if ! defined tB
+#error "Incorrect configuration of tA and tB defines"
+#endif
 
 /* Structures with a single field nested to various depths, along with
    some empty structures.  */
-struct struct01 { ES(es1); struct { struct { tA a; } s1; } s2; };
-struct struct02 { tA a; struct { struct { ES(es1); } s1; } s2; };
-struct struct03 { struct { struct { ES(es1); } s1; } s2; ES(es1); struct { struct { tA a; } s3; } s4;};
-struct struct04 { ES(es1); ES(es2); tA a; ES(es3); };
+struct struct_01_01 { ES(es1); struct { struct { tA a; } s1; } s2; };
+struct struct_01_02 { tA a; struct { struct { ES(es1); } s1; } s2; };
+struct struct_01_03 { struct { struct { ES(es1); } s1; } s2; ES(es1); struct { struct { tA a; } s3; } s4;};
+struct struct_01_04 { ES(es1); ES(es2); tA a; ES(es3); };
+
+/* Structures with two fields nested to various depths, along with
+   some empty structures.  */
+struct struct_02_01 { ES(es1); struct { struct { tA a; tB b; } s1; } s2; };
+struct struct_02_02 { tA a; struct { struct { ES(es1); } s1; } s2; tB b; };
+struct struct_02_03 { struct { struct { ES(es1); } s1; } s2; ES(es1); struct { struct { tA a; } s3; } s4; struct { struct { tB b; } s5; } s6;};
+struct struct_02_04 { ES(es1); ES(es2); tA a; ES(es3); tB b; };
+
+/* Structures with four fields nested to various depths, along with
+   some empty structures.  */
+struct struct_04_01 { ES(es1); struct { struct { tA a; tB b; tA c; tB d; } s1; } s2; };
+struct struct_04_02 { tA a; struct { struct { ES(es1); } s1; } s2; tB b; struct { struct { ES(es1); } s2; } s3; tA c; struct { struct { ES(es2); } s4; } s5; tB d;};
+struct struct_04_03 { struct { struct { ES(es1); } s1; } s2; ES(es1); struct { struct { tA a; } s3; } s4; struct { struct { tB b; } s5; } s6; struct { struct { tA c; } s7; } s8; struct { struct { tB d; } s9; } s10;};
+struct struct_04_04 { ES(es1); ES(es2); tA a; ES(es3); tB b; ES(es4); tA c; ES(es5); tB d; };
+
+/* Structures with five fields nested to various depths, along with
+   some empty structures.  */
+struct struct_05_01 { ES(es1); struct { struct { tA a; tB b; tA c; tB d; tA e; } s1; } s2; };
+struct struct_05_02 { tA a; struct { struct { ES(es1); } s1; } s2; tB b; struct { struct { ES(es1); } s2; } s3; tA c; struct { struct { ES(es2); } s4; } s5; tB d; struct { struct { ES(es2); } s6; } s7; tB e;};
+struct struct_05_03 { struct { struct { ES(es1); } s1; } s2; ES(es1); struct { struct { tA a; } s3; } s4; struct { struct { tB b; } s5; } s6; struct { struct { tA c; } s7; } s8; struct { struct { tB d; } s9; } s10; struct { struct { tA e; } s11; } s12;};
+struct struct_05_04 { ES(es1); ES(es2); tA a; ES(es3); tB b; ES(es4); tA c; ES(es5); tB d; ES(es6); tA e; };
 
-int cmp_struct01 (struct struct01 a, struct struct01 b)
+int cmp_struct_01_01 (struct struct_01_01 a, struct struct_01_01 b)
 { return a.s2.s1.a == b.s2.s1.a; }
 
-int cmp_struct02 (struct struct02 a, struct struct02 b)
+int cmp_struct_01_02 (struct struct_01_02 a, struct struct_01_02 b)
 { return a.a == b.a; }
 
-int cmp_struct03 (struct struct03 a, struct struct03 b)
+int cmp_struct_01_03 (struct struct_01_03 a, struct struct_01_03 b)
 { return a.s4.s3.a == b.s4.s3.a; }
 
-int cmp_struct04 (struct struct04 a, struct struct04 b)
+int cmp_struct_01_04 (struct struct_01_04 a, struct struct_01_04 b)
 { return a.a == b.a; }
 
-REF_VAL(struct01) = { {}, { { 'a' } } };
-REF_VAL(struct02) = { 'a', { { {} } } };
-REF_VAL(struct03) = { { { {} } }, {}, { { 'a' } } };
-REF_VAL(struct04) = { {}, {}, 'a', {} };
+int cmp_struct_02_01 (struct struct_02_01 a, struct struct_02_01 b)
+{ return a.s2.s1.a == b.s2.s1.a && a.s2.s1.b == a.s2.s1.b; }
 
-#elif defined tA && defined tB
+int cmp_struct_02_02 (struct struct_02_02 a, struct struct_02_02 b)
+{ return a.a == b.a && a.b == b.b; }
 
-/* These structures all have 2 fields, nested to various depths, along
-   with some empty structures.  */
-struct struct01 { struct { tA a; } s1; ES (e1); struct { struct { tB b; } s2;} s3;};
-struct struct02 { struct { struct { tA a; } s1; ES(e1); } s2; struct { struct { tB b; } s3;} s4; ES(e2);};
-struct struct03 { ES(e1); tA a; ES (e2); struct { struct { tB b; } s2;} s3;};
-struct struct04 { ES(e1); ES (e2); struct { struct { struct { tA a; struct { ES(e3); } s1; tB b; } s2; } s3;} s4;};
+int cmp_struct_02_03 (struct struct_02_03 a, struct struct_02_03 b)
+{ return a.s4.s3.a == b.s4.s3.a && a.s6.s5.b == b.s6.s5.b; }
 
-int cmp_struct01 (struct struct01 a, struct struct01 b)
-{ return a.s1.a == b.s1.a && a.s3.s2.b == b.s3.s2.b; }
+int cmp_struct_02_04 (struct struct_02_04 a, struct struct_02_04 b)
+{ return a.a == b.a && a.b == b.b; }
 
-int cmp_struct02 (struct struct02 a, struct struct02 b)
-{ return a.s2.s1.a == b.s2.s1.a && a.s4.s3.b == b.s4.s3.b; }
+int cmp_struct_04_01 (struct struct_04_01 a, struct struct_04_01 b)
+{ return a.s2.s1.a == b.s2.s1.a && a.s2.s1.b == a.s2.s1.b
+	 && a.s2.s1.c == b.s2.s1.c && a.s2.s1.d == a.s2.s1.d; }
 
-int cmp_struct03 (struct struct03 a, struct struct03 b)
-{ return a.a == b.a && a.s3.s2.b == b.s3.s2.b; }
+int cmp_struct_04_02 (struct struct_04_02 a, struct struct_04_02 b)
+{ return a.a == b.a && a.b == b.b && a.c == b.c && a.d == b.d; }
 
-int cmp_struct04 (struct struct04 a, struct struct04 b)
-{ return a.s4.s3.s2.a == b.s4.s3.s2.a && a.s4.s3.s2.b == b.s4.s3.s2.b; }
+int cmp_struct_04_03 (struct struct_04_03 a, struct struct_04_03 b)
+{ return a.s4.s3.a == b.s4.s3.a && a.s6.s5.b == b.s6.s5.b
+	 && a.s8.s7.c == b.s8.s7.c && a.s10.s9.d == b.s10.s9.d; }
 
-REF_VAL(struct01) = { { 'a' }, {}, { { '1' } } };
-REF_VAL(struct02) = { { { 'a' }, {} }, { { '1' } }, {} };
-REF_VAL(struct03) = { {}, 'a', {}, { { '1' } } };
-REF_VAL(struct04) = { {}, {}, { { { 'a', {}, '1'} } } } ;
+int cmp_struct_04_04 (struct struct_04_04 a, struct struct_04_04 b)
+{ return a.a == b.a && a.b == b.b && a.c == b.c && a.d == b.d; }
 
-#else
+int cmp_struct_05_01 (struct struct_05_01 a, struct struct_05_01 b)
+{ return a.s2.s1.a == b.s2.s1.a && a.s2.s1.b == a.s2.s1.b
+	 && a.s2.s1.c == b.s2.s1.c && a.s2.s1.d == a.s2.s1.d
+	 && a.s2.s1.e == b.s2.s1.e; }
 
-#error "Incorrect configuration of tA and tB defines"
+int cmp_struct_05_02 (struct struct_05_02 a, struct struct_05_02 b)
+{ return a.a == b.a && a.b == b.b && a.c == b.c && a.d == b.d && a.e == b.e; }
 
-#endif
+int cmp_struct_05_03 (struct struct_05_03 a, struct struct_05_03 b)
+{ return a.s4.s3.a == b.s4.s3.a && a.s6.s5.b == b.s6.s5.b
+	 && a.s8.s7.c == b.s8.s7.c && a.s10.s9.d == b.s10.s9.d
+	 && a.s12.s11.e == b.s12.s11.e; }
+
+int cmp_struct_05_04 (struct struct_05_04 a, struct struct_05_04 b)
+{ return a.a == b.a && a.b == b.b && a.c == b.c && a.d == b.d && a.e == b.e; }
+
+REF_VAL(struct_01_01) = { {}, { { 'a' } } };
+REF_VAL(struct_01_02) = { 'a', { { {} } } };
+REF_VAL(struct_01_03) = { { { {} } }, {}, { { 'a' } } };
+REF_VAL(struct_01_04) = { {}, {}, 'a', {} };
+
+REF_VAL(struct_02_01) = { {}, { { 'a', 'b' } } };
+REF_VAL(struct_02_02) = { 'a', { { {} } }, 'b' };
+REF_VAL(struct_02_03) = { { { {} } }, {}, { { 'a' } }, { { 'b' } } };
+REF_VAL(struct_02_04) = { {}, {}, 'a', {}, 'b' };
+
+REF_VAL(struct_04_01) = { {}, { { 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd' } } };
+REF_VAL(struct_04_02) = { 'a', { { {} } }, 'b', { { {} } }, 'c', { { {} } }, 'd' };
+REF_VAL(struct_04_03) = { { { {} } }, {}, { { 'a' } }, { { 'b' } }, { { 'c' } }, { { 'd' } } };
+REF_VAL(struct_04_04) = { {}, {}, 'a', {}, 'b', {}, 'c', {}, 'd' };
+
+REF_VAL(struct_05_01) = { {}, { { 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e' } } };
+REF_VAL(struct_05_02) = { 'a', { { {} } }, 'b', { { {} } }, 'c', { { {} } }, 'd', { { {} } }, 'e' };
+REF_VAL(struct_05_03) = { { { {} } }, {}, { { 'a' } }, { { 'b' } }, { { 'c' } }, { { 'd' } }, { { 'e' } } };
+REF_VAL(struct_05_04) = { {}, {}, 'a', {}, 'b', {}, 'c', {}, 'd', {}, 'e' };
 
 /* Create all of the functions GDB will call to check functionality.  */
-MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct01)
-MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct02)
-MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct03)
-MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct04)
+MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct_01_01)
+MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct_01_02)
+MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct_01_03)
+MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct_01_04)
+MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct_02_01)
+MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct_02_02)
+MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct_02_03)
+MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct_02_04)
+MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct_04_01)
+MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct_04_02)
+MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct_04_03)
+MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct_04_04)
+MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct_05_01)
+MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct_05_02)
+MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct_05_03)
+MAKE_CHECK_FUNCS(struct_05_04)
 
 #define CALL_LINE(NAME) val += check_arg_ ## NAME (rtn_str_ ## NAME ())
 
@@ -132,10 +196,22 @@ call_all ()
 {
   int val;
 
-  CALL_LINE(struct01);
-  CALL_LINE(struct02);
-  CALL_LINE(struct03);
-  CALL_LINE(struct04);
+  CALL_LINE(struct_01_01);
+  CALL_LINE(struct_01_02);
+  CALL_LINE(struct_01_03);
+  CALL_LINE(struct_01_04);
+  CALL_LINE(struct_02_01);
+  CALL_LINE(struct_02_02);
+  CALL_LINE(struct_02_03);
+  CALL_LINE(struct_02_04);
+  CALL_LINE(struct_04_01);
+  CALL_LINE(struct_04_02);
+  CALL_LINE(struct_04_03);
+  CALL_LINE(struct_04_04);
+  CALL_LINE(struct_05_01);
+  CALL_LINE(struct_05_02);
+  CALL_LINE(struct_05_03);
+  CALL_LINE(struct_05_04);
 
   return (val != 4);
 }
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.exp
index e4cee5afad..b10e6d21eb 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.exp
@@ -102,7 +102,10 @@ proc start_nested_structs_test { types } {
 proc run_tests {} {
     global gdb_prompt
 
-    foreach {name} {struct01 struct02 struct03 struct04} {
+    foreach {name} {struct_01_01 struct_01_02 struct_01_03 struct_01_04
+                    struct_02_01 struct_02_02 struct_02_03 struct_02_04
+                    struct_04_01 struct_04_02 struct_04_03 struct_04_04
+                    struct_05_01 struct_05_02 struct_05_03 struct_05_04} {
 	gdb_test "p/d check_arg_${name} (ref_val_${name})" "= 1"
 
 	set refval [ get_valueof "" "ref_val_${name}" "" ]
-- 
2.15.2 (Apple Git-101.1)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-20  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-20  9:29 [PATCH 0/4] Aarch64: Correctly support args passed in float registers Alan Hayward
2018-08-20  9:29 ` [PATCH 1/4] Aarch64: Func to detect args passed in float regs Alan Hayward
2018-08-28 15:43   ` Simon Marchi
2018-08-28 15:49     ` Alan Hayward
2018-08-28 16:00       ` Simon Marchi
2018-08-20  9:30 ` Alan Hayward [this message]
2018-08-28 16:52   ` [PATCH 4/4] infcall-nested-structs: Test up to five fields Simon Marchi
2018-08-20  9:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] Aarch64: Float register detection for return values Alan Hayward
2018-08-28 16:03   ` Simon Marchi
2018-08-20  9:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] Aarch64: Float register detection for _push_dummy_call Alan Hayward
2018-08-28 15:58   ` Simon Marchi
2018-08-28  9:39 ` [Ping][PATCH 0/4] Aarch64: Correctly support args passed in float registers Alan Hayward

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180820092933.83224-5-alan.hayward@arm.com \
    --to=alan.hayward@arm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox