From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 130599 invoked by alias); 9 May 2018 14:00:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 130487 invoked by uid 89); 9 May 2018 14:00:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=greatest, years X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 May 2018 14:00:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87EF01170B2; Wed, 9 May 2018 10:00:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NydiV-ibw5PI; Wed, 9 May 2018 10:00:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEC3116E2F; Wed, 9 May 2018 10:00:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 97F518304F; Wed, 9 May 2018 07:00:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 14:00:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Simon Marchi , Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Define GNULIB_NAMESPACE in unittests/string_view-selftests.c Message-ID: <20180509140023.u55vt62z4mijmpf2@adacore.com> References: <1525382648-30186-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <20180504165552.f4y7zcxzmgvwngel@adacore.com> <38335bd5-7e46-23e2-a45b-da970a1b8680@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SW-Source: 2018-05/txt/msg00194.txt.bz2 [...] > ... and that's what led to last year's C++ wildmatching support, > "b -qualified", tab completion improvements, etc. Very interesting, erm, story. Thanks for taking the time to share it again. > So I was waiting for gdb 8.1 (at least) to be out before proposing > moving all of gdb to a namespace, in order to give folks a little > time to get comfortable with the new features, and make it > reasonable to suggest that folks upgrade their top gdb to 8.1 (a > released version) instead of to git/trunk gdb if they want to gdb > a bit more conveniently. That's why I was wondering whether > now would be good time to propose moving forward with the > "namespace gdb" approach, since 8.1 has been out for a bit. Personally, I always use the latest and greatest, as a way of giving it more actual-use testing. So switching now wouldn't be a problem. Since 8.1 is out, and we had very very very very very few bug reports so far, I would vote for going ahead now. -- Joel