Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Define GNULIB_NAMESPACE in unittests/string_view-selftests.c
Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 16:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180504165552.f4y7zcxzmgvwngel@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1525382648-30186-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com>

> When building with x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ (to test cross-compiling for
> Windows), I get this error:
> 
> unittests/string_view-selftests.o: In function `selftests::string_view::inserters_2::test05(unsigned long long)':
> /home/emaisin/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/unittests/basic_string_view/inserters/char/2.cc:60: undefined reference to `std::basic_ofstream<char, std::char_traits<char> >::rpl_close()'
> 
> This is caused by gnulib redefining "close" as "rpl_close", and
> therefore messing up the declaration of basic_ofstream in the libstdc++
> header.  The solution would be to use gnulib namespaces [1].  Until we
> use them across GDB, we can use them locally in files that are
> problematic, like this one.
> 
> gdb/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* unittests/string_view-selftests.c: Define GNULIB_NAMESPACE.

I noticed the exact same problem, and came up with the exact same
solution. Sorry for not reporting right away, I have been swamped
:-( and also wanted to spend some more time investigating the bigger
picture; it seems to me like we may be having a huge time bomb
in our hands?!?

In other words, either we don't define GNULIB_NAMESPACE, but then
we run into unwanted renames of class method names; or we defined
GNULIB_NAMESPACE, but that means we must be prefixing all the symbols
we call that are covered by the imported part of GNULIB with that
namespace.

What worries me is that I don't see what's preventing us from hitting
that issue outside of the unittests code? We know we can adjust our
own classes, but this problem occured with a system class, so we had
no choice but to use GNULIB_NAMESPACE. I worry that the transition
from no GNULIB_NAMESPACE to using GNULIB_NAMESPACE in a given unit
will leave some C system calls that should normally be covered by
gnulib silently now reverting to the system (buggy) version.

-- 
Joel


  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-04 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-03 21:25 Simon Marchi
2018-05-04 16:55 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2018-05-04 16:59   ` Joel Brobecker
2018-05-04 17:11   ` Pedro Alves
2018-05-04 17:24     ` Joel Brobecker
2018-05-08 20:47     ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-08 21:22       ` Joel Brobecker
2018-05-09 13:50       ` Pedro Alves
2018-05-09 14:00         ` Joel Brobecker
2018-05-09 15:19         ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-04 17:14   ` Simon Marchi
2018-05-04 17:20     ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180504165552.f4y7zcxzmgvwngel@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox