Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: [RFA 05/12] Change value history to use value_ref_ptr
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 21:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180405211507.6103-6-tom@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180405211507.6103-1-tom@tromey.com>

This simplifies the value history implementation by replacing the
current data structure with a std::vector, and by making the value
history simply hold a reference to each value.

ChangeLog
2018-04-05  Tom Tromey  <tom@tromey.com>

	* value.c (VALUE_HISTORY_CHUNK, struct value_history_chunk)
	(value_history_chain, value_history_count): Remove.
	(value_history): New global.
	(record_latest_value, access_value_history, show_values)
	(preserve_values): Update.
---
 gdb/ChangeLog |  8 ++++++++
 gdb/value.c   | 66 +++++++++++------------------------------------------------
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/value.c b/gdb/value.c
index 013fcfe3ed..677ec42e63 100644
--- a/gdb/value.c
+++ b/gdb/value.c
@@ -881,25 +881,10 @@ value_contents_eq (const struct value *val1, LONGEST offset1,
 }
 
 
-/* The value-history records all the values printed
-   by print commands during this session.  Each chunk
-   records 60 consecutive values.  The first chunk on
-   the chain records the most recent values.
-   The total number of values is in value_history_count.  */
+/* The value-history records all the values printed by print commands
+   during this session.  */
 
-#define VALUE_HISTORY_CHUNK 60
-
-struct value_history_chunk
-  {
-    struct value_history_chunk *next;
-    struct value *values[VALUE_HISTORY_CHUNK];
-  };
-
-/* Chain of chunks now in use.  */
-
-static struct value_history_chunk *value_history_chain;
-
-static int value_history_count;	/* Abs number of last entry stored.  */
+static std::vector<value_ref_ptr> value_history;
 
 \f
 /* List of all value objects currently allocated
@@ -1898,24 +1883,9 @@ record_latest_value (struct value *val)
      but the current contents of that location.  c'est la vie...  */
   val->modifiable = 0;
 
-  /* Here we treat value_history_count as origin-zero
-     and applying to the value being stored now.  */
-
-  i = value_history_count % VALUE_HISTORY_CHUNK;
-  if (i == 0)
-    {
-      struct value_history_chunk *newobj = XCNEW (struct value_history_chunk);
+  value_history.push_back (release_value (val));
 
-      newobj->next = value_history_chain;
-      value_history_chain = newobj;
-    }
-
-  value_history_chain->values[i] = release_value (val).release ();
-
-  /* Now we regard value_history_count as origin-one
-     and applying to the value just stored.  */
-
-  return ++value_history_count;
+  return value_history.size ();
 }
 
 /* Return a copy of the value in the history with sequence number NUM.  */
@@ -1923,12 +1893,11 @@ record_latest_value (struct value *val)
 struct value *
 access_value_history (int num)
 {
-  struct value_history_chunk *chunk;
   int i;
   int absnum = num;
 
   if (absnum <= 0)
-    absnum += value_history_count;
+    absnum += value_history.size ();
 
   if (absnum <= 0)
     {
@@ -1939,20 +1908,12 @@ access_value_history (int num)
       else
 	error (_("History does not go back to $$%d."), -num);
     }
-  if (absnum > value_history_count)
+  if (absnum > value_history.size ())
     error (_("History has not yet reached $%d."), absnum);
 
   absnum--;
 
-  /* Now absnum is always absolute and origin zero.  */
-
-  chunk = value_history_chain;
-  for (i = (value_history_count - 1) / VALUE_HISTORY_CHUNK
-	 - absnum / VALUE_HISTORY_CHUNK;
-       i > 0; i--)
-    chunk = chunk->next;
-
-  return value_copy (chunk->values[absnum % VALUE_HISTORY_CHUNK]);
+  return value_copy (value_history[absnum].get ());
 }
 
 static void
@@ -1972,13 +1933,13 @@ show_values (const char *num_exp, int from_tty)
   else
     {
       /* "show values" means print the last 10 values.  */
-      num = value_history_count - 9;
+      num = value_history.size () - 9;
     }
 
   if (num <= 0)
     num = 1;
 
-  for (i = num; i < num + 10 && i <= value_history_count; i++)
+  for (i = num; i < num + 10 && i <= value_history.size (); i++)
     {
       struct value_print_options opts;
 
@@ -2626,7 +2587,6 @@ void
 preserve_values (struct objfile *objfile)
 {
   htab_t copied_types;
-  struct value_history_chunk *cur;
   struct internalvar *var;
   int i;
 
@@ -2634,10 +2594,8 @@ preserve_values (struct objfile *objfile)
      it is soon to be deleted.  */
   copied_types = create_copied_types_hash (objfile);
 
-  for (cur = value_history_chain; cur; cur = cur->next)
-    for (i = 0; i < VALUE_HISTORY_CHUNK; i++)
-      if (cur->values[i])
-	preserve_one_value (cur->values[i], objfile, copied_types);
+  for (const value_ref_ptr &item : value_history)
+    preserve_one_value (item.get (), objfile, copied_types);
 
   for (var = internalvars; var; var = var->next)
     preserve_one_internalvar (var, objfile, copied_types);
-- 
2.13.6


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-05 21:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-05 21:16 [RFA 00/12] (somewhat) clean up struct value ownership Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 10/12] Change value::parent to a value_ref_ptr Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 12/12] Change value::contents to be a unique_xmalloc_ptr Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 09/12] Use new and delete for values Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 11/12] Remove range_s VEC Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 01/12] Introduce a gdb_ref_ptr specialization for struct value Tom Tromey
2018-04-06 19:29   ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 02/12] Change breakpoints to use value_ref_ptr Tom Tromey
2018-04-06 19:31   ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-06 21:31     ` Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 07/12] Remove free_value_chain Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 06/12] Remove free_all_values Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 08/12] Remove value::next and value::released Tom Tromey
2018-04-06 19:32   ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-06 21:40     ` Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 03/12] Change last_examine_value to value_ref_ptr Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 04/12] Change varobj to use value_ref_ptr Tom Tromey
2018-04-06 19:33 ` [RFA 00/12] (somewhat) clean up struct value ownership Pedro Alves
2018-04-06 21:20   ` Tom Tromey
2018-04-06 21:44   ` Tom Tromey
2018-04-08 21:32   ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180405211507.6103-6-tom@tromey.com \
    --to=tom@tromey.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox