On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 17:52:21 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 00:58:47 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > I'm seeing a few regressions compared to .gdb_index, using
> > --target_board=dwarf4-gdb-index :
> > 
> > -PASS: gdb.base/enumval.exp: p ZERO 
> > +FAIL: gdb.base/enumval.exp: p ZERO 
> ...
> > etc.  There are a few more.  That board has:
> > 
> >  set_board_info debug_flags "-gdwarf-4 -fdebug-types-section"
> > 
> > and if I remove "-fdebug-types-section", then the series
> > is regression-free compared to .gdb_index.  Have you seen this?
...
> The .debug_names completely misses its support as it does not even produce
> DW_IDX_type_unit.

Here you are, could you also verify my regression testing for this patch?


Thanks,
Jan