From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 119122 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2017 21:00:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 119108 invoked by uid 89); 29 Nov 2017 21:00:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=delivering, lunch X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:00:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEC61169A7; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:00:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id haZqh8LjRNb9; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:00:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B03116979; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:00:45 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3FC46809B5; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:00:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:00:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: time to create the GDB 8.1.x branch? Message-ID: <20171129210045.3n643j2ob2c3szfl@adacore.com> References: <20171128194442.8103FD80317@oc3748833570.ibm.com> <783661b7-869e-cc95-6767-ff89e2634359@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <783661b7-869e-cc95-6767-ff89e2634359@redhat.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg00798.txt.bz2 > > I agree. Your suggestion sounded good to me. I just haven't > > yet had time to try it out. I wouldn't be offended if someone > > beat me to it... :-) > > I tried it now and it seems to work fine, and the test I had added > works on ppc too with that fix. I'll some more testing and > post it after lunch. Thanks for the heads up and for delivering the fix so quickly. As far as I can tell, it's very close to getting in, so I will not bother adding an item in the release wiki page. I assume it will get in before some other pending patches do. But do let me know if it somehow gets delayed and should be tracked in the release wiki page! -- Joel