From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: [RFA] Remove cleanup from frame_prepare_for_sniffer
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2017 22:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171008225243.21921-1-tom@tromey.com> (raw)
Currently frame_prepare_for_sniffer returns a cleanup. This patch
changes it to return void, and exposes frame_cleanup_after_sniffer to
the caller.
Normally I would write an RAII class for this sort of thing; but
because there was just a single caller of frame_prepare_for_sniffer,
and because this caller is already using try/catch, I thought it
seemed ok to require explicit calls in this instance.
Regression tested by the buildbot.
gdb/ChangeLog
2017-10-08 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* frame-unwind.c (frame_unwind_try_unwinder): Update.
* frame.h (frame_cleanup_after_sniffer): Declare.
(frame_prepare_for_sniffer): Return void.
* frame.c (frame_cleanup_after_sniffer): No longer static. Change
type of argument.
(frame_prepare_for_sniffer): Return void.
---
gdb/ChangeLog | 9 +++++++++
gdb/frame-unwind.c | 12 ++++--------
gdb/frame.c | 13 +++++--------
gdb/frame.h | 13 +++++++++----
4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/frame-unwind.c b/gdb/frame-unwind.c
index 096631c58b..ede226abb0 100644
--- a/gdb/frame-unwind.c
+++ b/gdb/frame-unwind.c
@@ -97,10 +97,9 @@ static int
frame_unwind_try_unwinder (struct frame_info *this_frame, void **this_cache,
const struct frame_unwind *unwinder)
{
- struct cleanup *old_cleanup;
int res = 0;
- old_cleanup = frame_prepare_for_sniffer (this_frame, unwinder);
+ frame_prepare_for_sniffer (this_frame, unwinder);
TRY
{
@@ -117,7 +116,7 @@ frame_unwind_try_unwinder (struct frame_info *this_frame, void **this_cache,
thus most unwinders aren't able to determine if they're
the best fit. Keep trying. Fallback prologue unwinders
should always accept the frame. */
- do_cleanups (old_cleanup);
+ frame_cleanup_after_sniffer (this_frame);
return 0;
}
throw_exception (ex);
@@ -125,15 +124,12 @@ frame_unwind_try_unwinder (struct frame_info *this_frame, void **this_cache,
END_CATCH
if (res)
- {
- discard_cleanups (old_cleanup);
- return 1;
- }
+ return 1;
else
{
/* Don't set *THIS_CACHE to NULL here, because sniffer has to do
so. */
- do_cleanups (old_cleanup);
+ frame_cleanup_after_sniffer (this_frame);
return 0;
}
gdb_assert_not_reached ("frame_unwind_try_unwinder");
diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c
index afdc157ebd..17f7397aee 100644
--- a/gdb/frame.c
+++ b/gdb/frame.c
@@ -2864,11 +2864,9 @@ frame_stop_reason_symbol_string (enum unwind_stop_reason reason)
/* Clean up after a failed (wrong unwinder) attempt to unwind past
FRAME. */
-static void
-frame_cleanup_after_sniffer (void *arg)
+void
+frame_cleanup_after_sniffer (struct frame_info *frame)
{
- struct frame_info *frame = (struct frame_info *) arg;
-
/* The sniffer should not allocate a prologue cache if it did not
match this frame. */
gdb_assert (frame->prologue_cache == NULL);
@@ -2893,16 +2891,15 @@ frame_cleanup_after_sniffer (void *arg)
}
/* Set FRAME's unwinder temporarily, so that we can call a sniffer.
- Return a cleanup which should be called if unwinding fails, and
- discarded if it succeeds. */
+ If sniffing fails, the caller should be sure to call
+ frame_cleanup_after_sniffer. */
-struct cleanup *
+void
frame_prepare_for_sniffer (struct frame_info *frame,
const struct frame_unwind *unwind)
{
gdb_assert (frame->unwind == NULL);
frame->unwind = unwind;
- return make_cleanup (frame_cleanup_after_sniffer, frame);
}
static struct cmd_list_element *set_backtrace_cmdlist;
diff --git a/gdb/frame.h b/gdb/frame.h
index 1b726108b9..190ce7623f 100644
--- a/gdb/frame.h
+++ b/gdb/frame.h
@@ -791,11 +791,16 @@ extern void info_locals_command (char *, int);
extern void return_command (char *, int);
/* Set FRAME's unwinder temporarily, so that we can call a sniffer.
- Return a cleanup which should be called if unwinding fails, and
- discarded if it succeeds. */
+ If sniffing fails, the caller should be sure to call
+ frame_cleanup_after_sniffer. */
-struct cleanup *frame_prepare_for_sniffer (struct frame_info *frame,
- const struct frame_unwind *unwind);
+extern void frame_prepare_for_sniffer (struct frame_info *frame,
+ const struct frame_unwind *unwind);
+
+/* Clean up after a failed (wrong unwinder) attempt to unwind past
+ FRAME. */
+
+extern void frame_cleanup_after_sniffer (struct frame_info *frame);
/* Notes (cagney/2002-11-27, drow/2003-09-06):
--
2.13.6
next reply other threads:[~2017-10-08 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-08 22:52 Tom Tromey [this message]
2017-10-09 2:08 ` Simon Marchi
2018-02-14 15:55 ` [PATCH] Fix GDB crash after Quit thrown from unwinder sniffer (Re: [RFA] Remove cleanup from frame_prepare_for_sniffer) Pedro Alves
2018-02-14 16:58 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171008225243.21921-1-tom@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox