From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 35402 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2017 17:01:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 35388 invoked by uid 89); 5 Oct 2017 17:01:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.158.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 17:01:33 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v95H1KfO002052 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:01:32 -0400 Received: from e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2ddpr36pxc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 13:01:25 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 18:00:57 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.140) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 18:00:54 +0100 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id v95H0rIN7733264; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:00:53 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004EFA4057; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:56:35 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CAAA4055; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:56:34 +0100 (BST) Received: from oc3748833570.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.213.178]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 17:56:34 +0100 (BST) Received: by oc3748833570.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 81B60D835F0; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 19:00:53 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [RFC][06/19] Target FP: Use print_floating in tdep code To: uweigand@de.ibm.com (Ulrich Weigand) Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 17:01:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: macro@imgtec.com (Maciej W. Rozycki), gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20171005124759.473BBD835F0@oc3748833570.ibm.com> from "Ulrich Weigand" at Oct 05, 2017 02:47:59 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 17100517-0040-0000-0000-000003DFAF24 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17100517-0041-0000-0000-000025E11EBF Message-Id: <20171005170053.81B60D835F0@oc3748833570.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-10-05_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=1 spamscore=1 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710050235 X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00116.txt.bz2 > > I pushed your changes 01-06 combined through testing with a couple of > > MIPS/Linux targets, native and crossed (from x86-64), and all have > > consistently regressed in gdb.base/dfp-exprs.exp, e.g.: > [...] > > i.e. values to be output are missing, numerous across this test case. No > > other regressions though. > > This is surprising. Could you do a quick check whether the regression > is introduced with patch 6 of the series, or already with patch 5? Actually, never mind: I found the bug. This was an incorrectly shadowed variable that I must have introduced accidentally during the splitting of the patch series. A later patch in the series fixes the bug again ... This will be fixed when I post the next update as well. Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com