From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 36461 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2017 07:48:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 36087 invoked by uid 89); 31 Aug 2017 07:48:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=you! X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:48:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1ECB5609B; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 03:48:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id j6ujVgUPE+M3; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 03:48:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D9E5609C; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 03:48:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 851B685CB4; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 09:48:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:48:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: heads up: one week to 8.0.1 planned release time Message-ID: <20170831074823.add2hklyeqohsmkv@adacore.com> References: <20170828135048.56es2tsqsog2vuv2@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SW-Source: 2017-08/txt/msg00539.txt.bz2 > > The 8.0.1 release is currently planned for next Monday (Sep 4th). > > I took a look at the list of PRs still open, and only found one > > which wasn't a regressions, so I do not consider it blocking. > > Were you talking about #21827 ? If so I think it's a regression. Not that one, no. It was sim/20863, which was already failing in GDB 7.12. > Either way, I pushed the proposed patch to both master and gdb-8.0-branch. (y) > Yao found recently that remote multi-arch exec was broken, see this thread: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-08/msg00488.html > > I filed a PR: > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22021 > > and added it to the "maybe" list. I have posted a series to fix it > in the thread, it just needs some reviewing :) OK - thanks for the heads up. Jan also just sent a patch for 8.0.1 as well. I'll keep an eye on those, and hold the release a bit to give the patches some additional time if needed. Thank you! -- Joel