From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7233 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2017 15:38:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7189 invoked by uid 89); 11 Aug 2017 15:38:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:sk:static., HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-it0-f49.google.com Received: from mail-it0-f49.google.com (HELO mail-it0-f49.google.com) (209.85.214.49) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:38:21 +0000 Received: by mail-it0-f49.google.com with SMTP id 76so29502156ith.0; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 08:38:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=jzEXTt0Mv/7unn24PbtFLX/w3tyGY2Y8r7rm3Mp2IYU=; b=VfVTDRP6cgyNzRwc24aFnRXMB7wTClhbcuuwhBOepxtTg/Mmw3DFHrkvGChDEf27F+ e8a5ZMBZ5GKgXZ5q2KroQGS0CYqtsjJeQMgNFpPfskCMZKobfU8F5if3gsbLfdI9f44Q rEBFkUKHJREBztYXTewnAHsogPtKJ2Jv6sOjU3tsuZRZSEJinulp3Y3oyTbX1evNk+Lw pHWciYydjMKkB4tdIWHFZ3hH+vtxl/dfv1eRSxYV9uBEykgavfkV9lUM57MmAo0vXMc3 0+0ZcyC5ZcpIZe1dHTdDuOKuM6InrivFiYO97JO57U4eKID2QB0DEtpIB1Ttl2AuLI8K C3xA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5isBl2baJ7PDw8lOY4F/UnSJryQDuXE3E9ySgin5y0mJr87xanp 6/mYVQX7bYhpRSEE X-Received: by 10.36.181.23 with SMTP id v23mr12872760ite.163.1502465899131; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 08:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 1170ee0b50d5 (static.42.136.251.148.clients.your-server.de. [148.251.136.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y3sm502886ioy.12.2017.08.11.08.38.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Aug 2017 08:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 15:38:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi To: Pedro Alves Cc: Jiong Wang , GDB , Binutils Subject: Re: [AArch64][6/6] Core file support for "pauth" feature Message-ID: <20170811153815.GJ8039@1170ee0b50d5> References: <20170810212238.GE8039@1170ee0b50d5> <26b4881d-bec9-e2a6-fe96-13f2a44f7b1f@redhat.com> <20170810220402.GF8039@1170ee0b50d5> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20170810220402.GF8039@1170ee0b50d5> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-08/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 On 17-08-10 22:04:02, Yao Qi wrote: > > I want the macro name sync'ed with kernel. However I understand your > point. Let me see if I can ask kernel people change it to HWCAP_ARM64_APIA, > or something else. Kernel patches are not merged yet, as far I as > know. Kernel people don't want to change the naming scheme for new hwcaps. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-August/525204.html How about we unconditionally define HWCAP_ARM64_APIA in aarch64-linux-tdep.c? WDYT? #define HWCAP_ARM64_APIA (1 << 16) -- Yao (齐尧)