From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 128392 invoked by alias); 24 May 2017 15:49:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 128378 invoked by uid 89); 24 May 2017 15:49:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:567 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 May 2017 15:49:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F381BF28; Wed, 24 May 2017 11:49:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id tA+1M3f3tjcV; Wed, 24 May 2017 11:49:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E592FE7D; Wed, 24 May 2017 11:49:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E940080323; Wed, 24 May 2017 08:49:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 15:49:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 8.0 release update (2017-05-19) Message-ID: <20170524154939.nxfwycqu57y5pxy5@adacore.com> References: <20170519183006.cu272vhh65ogrgrn@adacore.com> <8337c036q0.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8337c036q0.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg00523.txt.bz2 Hi Eli, > > If I kept track of everything properly, I think we fixed all > > the known blocking issues. The area where I might be wrong about > > that are the libiberty patches for MinGW. Eli? > > They are in the works, but not there yet. I hope they will be ready > by the date you want to make the release, but I cannot be sure. As far as I can tell, at least 1 patch is still being discussed, and the others should be in; is that correct? Would you mind dropping me a note when we're good to go for the release? -- Joel