From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>, Tim Wiederhake <tim.wiederhake@intel.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Nitish Kumar Mishra <mishra.nitish.88@gmail.com>,
Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: GDB 8.0 release/branching update (10 more days to branching)
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170307002653.hofmtr2odt7cktvh@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH=s-PNyE=b8B6c527hKg+0fU7FPAMLB=R2w1dFGDtujftxMtA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Yao,
> Two issues in my mind,
Thanks for the heads up!
> I raised some questions on new record Python bindings,
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00023.html
> There is not test fail or regression, but it is about python api,
> which can't be changed after they are released. I want to make
> them more general, they are too btrace specific so far. This should
> be done by release, IMO.
>
> Current GDB mainline failed to build with old python, and Tim
> posted a patch https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-02/msg00712.html
> I requested Tim to add test case.
I've added those items to the list of "maybe" blocking before
branching. The first one in particular is worth having before,
I think, because we don't want to have people try a pre-release
with a different API, even if that would probably a marginal
portion of people.
The second one is mostly to avoid getting reports of this not working
when we already know. I could mention this as a known issue, but
it looks like we're not far from a resolution, so, might as well
wait.
> I'll go to Linaro Connect next week. I still check emails, but should
> be less active. I'll take some days off afterwards and back to work
> on March 16th. Then, I'll seriously start pre-release tests for ARM
> and AArch64, and fix bugs if any.
It sounds to me like it would be worth waiting for that testing to be
done before we branch. Say - we could re-evaluate the situation on
March 20th...
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-07 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-04 17:59 Joel Brobecker
2017-03-04 22:16 ` Yao Qi
2017-03-07 0:26 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2017-03-07 15:06 ` Pedro Alves
2017-03-09 18:52 ` Andreas Arnez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170307002653.hofmtr2odt7cktvh@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mishra.nitish.88@gmail.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
--cc=tim.wiederhake@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox