Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>, Tim Wiederhake <tim.wiederhake@intel.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
	Nitish Kumar Mishra <mishra.nitish.88@gmail.com>,
	Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
	Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: GDB 8.0 release/branching update (10 more days to branching)
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170307002653.hofmtr2odt7cktvh@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH=s-PNyE=b8B6c527hKg+0fU7FPAMLB=R2w1dFGDtujftxMtA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Yao,

> Two issues in my mind,

Thanks for the heads up!

> I raised some questions on new record Python bindings,
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-03/msg00023.html
> There is not test fail or regression, but it is about python api,
> which can't be changed after they are released.  I want to make
> them more general, they are too btrace specific so far.  This should
> be done by release, IMO.
> 
> Current GDB mainline failed to build with old python, and Tim
> posted a patch https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-02/msg00712.html
>  I requested Tim to add test case.

I've added those items to the list of "maybe" blocking before
branching. The first one in particular is worth having before,
I think, because we don't want to have people try a pre-release
with a different API, even if that would probably a marginal
portion of people.

The second one is mostly to avoid getting reports of this not working
when we already know. I could mention this as a known issue, but
it looks like we're not far from a resolution, so, might as well
wait.

> I'll go to Linaro Connect next week.  I still check emails, but should
> be less active.  I'll take some days off afterwards and back to work
> on March 16th.  Then, I'll seriously start pre-release tests for ARM
> and AArch64, and fix bugs if any.

It sounds to me like it would be worth waiting for that testing to be
done before we branch. Say - we could re-evaluate the situation on
March 20th...

-- 
Joel


  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-07  0:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-04 17:59 Joel Brobecker
2017-03-04 22:16 ` Yao Qi
2017-03-07  0:26   ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2017-03-07 15:06 ` Pedro Alves
2017-03-09 18:52 ` Andreas Arnez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170307002653.hofmtr2odt7cktvh@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=mishra.nitish.88@gmail.com \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    --cc=tim.wiederhake@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox