Re: [PATCH] Fix usage of inferior_ptid in two thread_alive implementations

Simon Marchi
2017-02-23T15:57:38Z

On 2017-02-22 22:34, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> But still it would be "more correct" to read the parameter instead
>> of the global, IMO.
>
> I didn't say anything to the contrary. I'm saying that if go32
> doesn't have this function called, I don't have to worry about the
> implications of the change.

Well, I'm saying that go32 _can_ have this function called. So you
should worry about the implications :).

Anyhow, given that go32 doesn't have multiple threads (thanks for
confirming), the patch shouldn't have any practical impact, so I've
pushed it.

Thanks,

Simon