Re: [PATCH] Fix usage of inferior_ptid in two thread_alive implementations

Pedro Alves
2017-02-08T12:40:43Z

On 02/07/2017 09:24 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> While inspecting some target code, I noticed that in these two
> implementations of thread_alive, inferior_ptid is referenced directly
> instead of using the ptid passed as parameters. I guess that it is
> wrong, although I can't really test it in both cases.

I can't test either, but it looks right to me.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves