Re: [PATCH] Fix usage of inferior_ptid in two thread_alive implementations

Simon Marchi
2017-02-09T16:46:57Z

On 2017-02-08 07:40, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 02/07/2017 09:24 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>> While inspecting some target code, I noticed that in these two
>> implementations of thread_alive, inferior_ptid is referenced directly
>> instead of using the ptid passed as parameters. I guess that it is
>> wrong, although I can't really test it in both cases.
>
> I can't test either, but it looks right to me.

Soooo.. is this an approval :) ?