From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 110164 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2016 06:38:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 110148 invoked by uid 89); 13 Dec 2016 06:38:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*i:sk:CABXYE2, H*f:sk:CABXYE2, H*i:sk:zyh9CvU, H*i:LOPB21YFrEVUp X-HELO: smtp.gentoo.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 06:38:27 +0000 Received: from vapier.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 600AB341229; Tue, 13 Dec 2016 06:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 06:38:00 -0000 From: Mike Frysinger To: Jim Wilson Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Nick Clifton Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for aarch64 sim tbnz bug Message-ID: <20161213063825.GY10558@vapier.lan> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Wilson , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Nick Clifton References: <20161212184245.GU10558@vapier.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UY7nlVifw84slYwb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg00277.txt.bz2 --UY7nlVifw84slYwb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 515 On 12 Dec 2016 16:32, Jim Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i think you want to stuff those pass/fail strings into the > > start macro instead of just having it get inserted where the > > include happened to show up. >=20 > That makes sense. Here is a new version of the patch with that > change. Retested with a sim make check, and all tests pass. at a high level, looks good. i haven't gotten into aarch64 (yet?), so can't really comment on the test specifics. -mike --UY7nlVifw84slYwb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYT5dhAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WB3MQQAJ03r/8gmGVnfcz5Yi1zmAmS w813R2/93nkioPLnB7A799nIb2+24FQuIKpWullq1JF1hzuf9lkMvnQI18CwMJJC ecDV+Ke8pMEZlkCscVfvScYghIRkgZnpA6zBN/JyQMa+iluk9Q21AEIO2k2qnPox +zD29Fzuwv7mp2yGPyNiQFAaPe5mTixkGA5uozu+aZv4JC9o/mBplL8hTLcYndAy Sh4ijrjERgchmwLRRKPRra5D/HdVTWO83jCT67pqBTSGGcWuJJuv5pl3Bg77ho2j ObRRJo2QnyDI2eqtFsSNJfZgVDP92CKsoID9z3uJpDG4YstKfgWaJAvYzxJpWeEQ 9O3z9p6/+RuUbBU9/zDiCV2RLbRi/FeH7+stxis8CYcyeDXEt/aiW624tETpJ5Do ILfLGZGj4KewBgKryq9ySDXw+6OpXvid75O/hd3tU7Et4g8NXYcxOwtWHpGiIj/R 3rV1VfXiOuX5AKm7X0y+k5imvwSe8sZ5F5xCddTtCh2Ceoj2wV7FUZEs+kUZ0aYk bNbAwkwSWYwHOkAzwMedG264kPbUV6hOOeMqJyDtYeGDP6j4aV/UiRidVzAgoz8N rIjESmDFdxV/Vy7BR5xonVadH7hPTrF3J6pogGnCQPfS33CjxpSIZYe76Xlsnd2q jbpdKu8Uhx0gQu8Wy9w2 =W1xA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UY7nlVifw84slYwb--