From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-133636-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 87818 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2016 16:19:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 87800 invoked by uid 89); 4 Oct 2016 16:19:05 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:19:05 +0000
Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF788B0431;	Tue,  4 Oct 2016 16:19:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-55.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.55])	by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u94GJ0Yp030091	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);	Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:19:03 -0400
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:19:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [testsuite patch] Fix recent GCC FAIL: gdb.arch/i386-signal.exp
Message-ID: <20161004161900.GA6231@host1.jankratochvil.net>
References: <20161003203500.GA2251@host1.jankratochvil.net> <CAH=s-POPK4vzPa9S-OMBTQ-xda6XeDrL=F1hx5FLC8=56bZ1FA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAH=s-POPK4vzPa9S-OMBTQ-xda6XeDrL=F1hx5FLC8=56bZ1FA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2

On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 18:07:56 +0200, Yao Qi wrote:
> > The .c patch will properly create a new corresponding source line .debug_line
> > entry for the 'mov $0x0,%eax' instruction and I also do not think it is
> > relevant to the purpose of this testfile.
> 
> Why do we need the second one?

I find it more cleaner but that is up to you.


Jan