From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 110248 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2016 13:28:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 110238 invoked by uid 89); 1 Aug 2016 13:28:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Gary X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 13:27:56 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18CACC057FA7; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blade.nx (ovpn-116-88.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.88]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u71DRsf1028018; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 09:27:54 -0400 Received: by blade.nx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D29872634F9; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 14:27:53 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 13:28:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: Yao Qi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [GDBserver] Remove td_ta_event_addr td_ta_set_event and td_ta_event_getmsg Message-ID: <20160801132753.GA11734@blade.nx> References: <1470043144-21617-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1470043144-21617-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-08/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 Hi Yao, Yao Qi wrote: > 2016-08-01 Yao Qi > > * thread-db.c (struct thread_db) : Remove. > : Remove. > (thread_db_load_search): Update. > (try_thread_db_load_1): Don't look for td_ta_event_addr, > td_ta_set_event and td_ta_event_getmsg. Not an objection, but... are these still used in GDB native? I'd really like to merge the two implementations at some point in the next months. Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/