From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-132645-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9112 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2016 14:39:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 8619 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jul 2016 14:38:59 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:38:49 +0000
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB5FD796F2;	Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:38:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-34.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.34])	by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u6KEciEw031439	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);	Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:38:46 -0400
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:39:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>,        "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [commit] [testsuite patch] Fix gdb.btrace/tailcall-only.exp errors on x86_64-m32
Message-ID: <20160720143844.GA14699@host1.jankratochvil.net>
References: <20160408155331.GA31979@host1.jankratochvil.net> <A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B23332A7343@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com> <4adcda99-ae37-00d8-c38f-37702f7a50b4@redhat.com> <20160720142247.GB16994@host1.jankratochvil.net> <A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B23332F7026@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com> <b370d5c2-6dab-bcd4-be69-0d020a6019ec@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b370d5c2-6dab-bcd4-be69-0d020a6019ec@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2016-07/txt/msg00222.txt.bz2

On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:36:46 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Not sure this particular commit, but AFAIK, there's no target
> triplet for x32, even.

https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/x32
->
x86_64-x32-linux


Jan