Re: [PATCH] Set unknown_syscall differently on arm linux

Yao Qi
2016-06-30T14:48:49Z

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> wow, that code is messed up. can you raise a bug with them ? there's
> even more code paths in there that result in SIGSEGV too. the history
> predates 2.4.0 afaict.

Sure, I can raise a bug somewhere or ask it in arm kernel mail list, but
why do you think it is a bug that SIGILL is raised when an illegal/unknown
syscall number is passed to syscall? because other archs don't behave
this way?

--
Yao (齐尧)