Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] aarch64: PR 19806: watchpoints: false negatives -> false positives
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 18:29:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160619182909.GA9883@host1.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <380b5288-f46f-3e20-c9c3-8cc8738ee322@redhat.com>

On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 20:46:35 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I thought of a case where this is the wrong thing to do.
> (Alternative below.)
> 
> The same example as before: e.g., a machine that only supports
> watching 32-bit-aligned words.  Then with:
> 
> union
> {
>   char buf[4];
>   uint32_t force_align;
> } global;
> 
> (gdb) watch global.buf[1];
> Hardware watchpoint 1 ...
> (gdb) watch global.buf[3];
> Hardware watchpoint 2 ...
> 
> ... if the program writes to global.buf[3], and the target
> reports a memory access to 'global.buf + 1' (because that's the
> first watchpoint in its own watchpoint list that overlaps
> the global.buf[0]..global.buf[3] range (what is really being
> watched)), gdb will believe that watchpoint 1 triggered, notice
> the value didn't change, and thus incorrectly ignore the watchpoint hit.

Here if the program really does 'global.buf[3] = 0xff;' then it still does
work as despite GDB places watchpoint at &global.buf[0] for 4 bytes aarch64
still reports the exact 1-byte location &global.buf[3]:
	echo -e 'union { char buf[8]; unsigned long ul; } u; int main(void) {\n u.buf[3]=0xff;\n return 0; }'|gcc -Wall -g -x c -;./gdb -data-directory ./data-directory/ ./a.out -ex start -ex 'watch u.buf[1]' -ex 'watch u.buf[3]' -ex c -ex 'p u.buf[1]' -ex 'p u.buf[3]'
	Hardware watchpoint 2: u.buf[1]
	Hardware watchpoint 3: u.buf[3]
	Continuing.
	Hardware watchpoint 3: u.buf[3]
	Old value = 0 '\000'
	New value = 255 '\377'
	main () at <stdin>:3
	3	in <stdin>
	$1 = 0 '\000'
	$2 = 255 '\377'

But you are right the watchpoint gets missed if the program writes to
&global.buf[0] a 4-byte value not modifying the contents of global.buf[1] but
modifying the contents of global.buf[3]:
	echo -e 'union { char buf[8]; unsigned long ul; } u; int main(void) {\n u.ul=0xff000000;\n return 0; }'|gcc -Wall -g -x c -;./gdb -data-directory ./data-directory/ ./a.out -ex start -ex 'watch u.buf[1]' -ex 'watch u.buf[3]' -ex 'b 3' -ex c -ex 'p u.buf[1]' -ex 'p u.buf[3]'
	Hardware watchpoint 2: u.buf[1]
	Hardware watchpoint 3: u.buf[3]
	Breakpoint 4 at 0x400570: file <stdin>, line 3.
	Continuing.
	Breakpoint 4, main () at <stdin>:3
	3	in <stdin>
	$1 = 0 '\000'
	$2 = 255 '\377'

I will follow with an add-on patch as I guess you think it makes sense to fix
GDB even for older kernels (assuming aarch64 kernel gets fixed in some time).


Thanks,
Jan


  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-19 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-06  8:00 Jan Kratochvil
2016-06-07 13:23 ` Yao Qi
2016-06-07 13:41   ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-07 15:25     ` Yao Qi
2016-06-07 16:04       ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-08 16:42         ` Yao Qi
2016-06-08 17:54           ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-08 18:46             ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-10  8:11               ` Yao Qi
2016-06-19 18:29               ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2016-06-20 11:47                 ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-20 14:12                   ` Jan Kratochvil
2016-06-20 14:40                     ` Pedro Alves
2017-03-27 21:11 ` obsolete: " Jan Kratochvil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160619182909.GA9883@host1.jankratochvil.net \
    --to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox