From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7993 invoked by alias); 2 May 2016 15:46:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7984 invoked by uid 89); 2 May 2016 15:46:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=joel, Joel, Hx-languages-length:1384, anwer X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 02 May 2016 15:46:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15985116ACB; Mon, 2 May 2016 11:46:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id G8zwd-MXeJzu; Mon, 2 May 2016 11:46:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD47F116795; Mon, 2 May 2016 11:46:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 879D942893; Mon, 2 May 2016 08:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 15:46:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb-7.11.1 re-spin update Message-ID: <20160502154642.GA4771@adacore.com> References: <20160425214951.GA4079@adacore.com> <571F5BF8.4090205@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <571F5BF8.4090205@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 Hi Pedro, Sorry I wasn't able to anwer this any sooner... > I was the one who first added these urls, sorry if it causes > you trouble, and sorry that I didn't reach out to you before > actually doing it. I thought in good faith that that would > be an obvious improvement. > > Let me explain what went through my mind: It makes sense. On the other hand, the first advantage of having it in the wiki was that I was able to subscribe to the release wiki page, and therefore get an email each time a chnage in made. The side effect of that I can then double-check the entries added, and in particular checking that someone is assigned that entry. If there is a way for me to subscribe to all bugzilla PRs that get assigned a specific release version, then the downside of using bugzilla only is less. I might still have to open the bugzilla PR to verify that the PR is assigned to someone, but given the number of such PRs, I can live with that. But the question is - can we subscribe to a category or all of bugzilla? Otherwise, if someone is already tracking bugzilla PRs and also understands the release process, I am fine delegating this part of the work. One of the important aspects of that is making sure that the information remains accurate, at least up to release; so that the release announcement is as correct as can be. WDYT? -- Joel