From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 47892 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2016 18:56:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 47039 invoked by uid 89); 18 Feb 2016 18:56:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=disappeared, HTo:D*pl X-HELO: e06smtp09.uk.ibm.com Received: from e06smtp09.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp09.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.105) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:56:51 +0000 Received: from localhost by e06smtp09.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:56:48 -0000 Received: from d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.14) by e06smtp09.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.139) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:56:47 -0000 X-IBM-Helo: d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: uweigand@de.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by d06dlp02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6412190023 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:56:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.250]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u1IIukCY52625544 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:56:46 GMT Received: from d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u1IIujbj028338 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:56:46 -0700 Received: from oc7340732750.ibm.com (dyn-9-152-213-148.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.213.148]) by d06av09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id u1IIujXX028334; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:56:45 -0700 Received: by oc7340732750.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 987626BEA; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:56:45 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Determine the iteration count based on wallclock instead of user+system time. To: m.koscielnicki@mimuw.edu.pl (=?UTF-8?Q?Marcin_Ko=c5=9bcielnicki?=) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:56:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: cole945@gmail.com (Wei-cheng Wang), gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <56C61211.1000708@mimuw.edu.pl> from "=?UTF-8?Q?Marcin_Ko=c5=9bcielnicki?=" at Feb 18, 2016 07:48:49 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20160218185645.987626BEA@oc7340732750.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16021818-0037-0000-0000-000005AB9686 X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00571.txt.bz2 > This patch has been accepted half a year ago, and the author has > disappeared. It fixes the same underlying issue as my patch at > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-01/msg00716.html . Since > this patch seems to be a smarter fix, I'd like to abandon mine, and go > with that one instead. I've just checked it - works just fine and fixes > the problem on s390{,x}-ibm-linux-gnu, no regressions on > x86_64-unknown-linx-gnu. > > OK to push? This is OK. Thanks, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com