From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 62762 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2016 08:20:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 62677 invoked by uid 89); 14 Feb 2016 08:19:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=sk:vlaval, UD:vla-value-sub-finish.exp, sk:vla-val, UD:vla-value-sub.exp X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:19:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CC74C0C2357; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-204-18.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.18]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u1E8JopL030778 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 14 Feb 2016 03:19:53 -0500 Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:20:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Andrew Burgess , Joel Brobecker Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves Subject: [commit] [testsuite patch] testsuite regression: gdb.fortran/vla-value-sub.exp gdb.fortran/vla-value-sub-finish.exp [Re: [PATCH 1/3] gdb: New set/show max-value-size command.] Message-ID: <20160214081950.GA4943@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160214043754.GO15342@adacore.com> <20160214005108.GE4770@embecosm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00446.txt.bz2 On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 01:51:08 +0100, Andrew Burgess wrote: > Not a maintainer, but this looks fine to me. On Sun, 14 Feb 2016 05:37:54 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Looks good to me. Checked in: e9fb005c0e95e642c2e5a65c02d026b4223082e6 And for 7.11: 307c2facb242da4fc557baea06e63d8e8a621142 Jan