Re: [PATCH v6 4/9] Explicit locations: introduce address locations

[Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>]

> I guess when it boils down to it, I don't really have a super strong
> preference for either case, but I do have a preference for maintaining
> addresses as a separate location type. What can I say? I hate special
> cases! :-P
> 
> > WDYT? I admit I'm a little lost still between the various layers
> > of locations, event_locations, etc. Do you want to take it from there?
> 
> I am more than happy to fix anything related to this code in any
> appropriate manner dictated by maintainers. [Of course, if this involves
> a massive rewrite, I will have to clear with my management!]
> 
> Let me know how you and other maintainers would like me to proceed.

Thanks for your insights, Keith. I agree the choice is not clearly
black or white; but because you probably know this area better than
anyone, I'm inclined to follow your suggestion. Given that the patch
I sent is close to what you would have written, I think it makes sense
for me to see this through, and have you help with the review? Any
comments on the current one before I proceed with a more official
submission?

Thanks!
-- 
Joel