From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 76150 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2015 21:28:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 76140 invoked by uid 89); 27 Oct 2015 21:28:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 21:28:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B54E8E364; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 21:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-96.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.96]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t9RLSWFG023476 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:28:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 15:30:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Keven Boell Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: off-trunk gdb.fortran/dwarf-stride.exp no longer PASSes [Re: [PATCH 0/2] fort_dyn_array: Enable basic Fortran dynamic array support] Message-ID: <20151027212831.GA3058@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <1435754532-17922-1-git-send-email-keven.boell@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1435754532-17922-1-git-send-email-keven.boell@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00643.txt.bz2 Hello, this is not a regression for FSF GDB; but at least these Fedora versions gdb-7.8.2-39.fc21.x86_64 gdb-7.9.1-17.fc22.x86_64 gdb-7.10-29.fc24.x86_64 PASS the attached testcase p c40pt(1)^M $1 = '0-hello', ' ' ^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.fortran/dwarf-stride.exp: p c40pt(1) p c40pt(2)^M $2 = '1-hello', ' ' ^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.fortran/dwarf-stride.exp: p c40pt(2) while current FSF trunk b80c3053162ec5533e120ee4e4ed30296d4c5fb2 FAILs on: p c40pt(1)^M $1 = '0-hello', ' ' ^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.fortran/dwarf-stride.exp: p c40pt(1) p c40pt(2)^M $2 = '\001\000\000\000\061-hello', ' ' ^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.fortran/dwarf-stride.exp: p c40pt(2) Curiously the Fedora GDB versions are based on: [PATCH 00/23] Fortran dynamic array support https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-06/msg00108.html https://github.com/intel-gdb/vla/tree/vla-fortran commit 511bff520372ffc10fa2ff569c176bdf1e6e475d (although I cannot find that commit hash in that github repo now) Couldn't the Intel patchset regress this testcase during its upstreaming? I haven't yet tried to really fix/debug it. Thanks, Jan