From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 35341 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2015 19:41:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 35329 invoked by uid 89); 12 Aug 2015 19:41:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 19:41:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2021429020; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:41:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9r9UGhs6yaCK; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:41:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D683B28F8C; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:41:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5E62746993; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:41:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 19:41:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Doug Evans Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior , Pedro Alves , Simon Marchi , gdb-patches , Yao Qi Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove symlinks created in argv0-symlink.exp and general cleanup Message-ID: <20150812194137.GG22245@adacore.com> References: <55BF85BC.8040102@ericsson.com> <55BF9811.50202@redhat.com> <20150804172110.GI4777@adacore.com> <55CB123F.70603@redhat.com> <87r3n85ukx.fsf@redhat.com> <20150812172225.GE22245@adacore.com> <20150812184307.GF22245@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00317.txt.bz2 > How often does it come up in the context of "make check" > (beyond the check-parallel implementation). > Other reasons for wanting to require GNU/Make are outside the scope > of my email. :-) That's true. But I think it's important to look at the complete picture while we're trying to decide the benefits vs downsides of switching over to GNU/Make. "make check" is one aspect that might benefit, but there are others, and it gives more weight, IMO, to the suggestion of making GNU/Make a requirement. -- Joel