From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 92726 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2015 20:00:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 92716 invoked by uid 89); 11 Aug 2015 20:00:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 20:00:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7ED798C27; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 20:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-20.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.20]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t7BK0PMn027809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:00:27 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 20:00:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Doug Evans Cc: Gary Benson , gdb-patches , Sandra Loosemore , Pedro Alves , =?utf-8?B?QW5kcsOpIFDDtm5pdHo=?= , Paul Koning Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Better handling of slow remote transfers Message-ID: <20150811200024.GA4804@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <001a11c301b0388ac5051d0c5ab8@google.com> <20150811185519.GA28644@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00251.txt.bz2 On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 21:43:47 +0200, Doug Evans wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > I would like to pinpoint that for patches targeting source distribution such > > an additional behavior change switch is a QA nightmare. > > I'm curious what the QA costs of, for example, --with-sysroot are. You are right it would make sense to make some cross-check that --with-sysroot containing the same data works the same. > [And in particular are they nightmarish?] It was just related to me personally because I am developing these days a related patchset on top of it. https://sourceware.org/git/?p=archer.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/jankratochvil/gdbserverbuildid-locate Jan