From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66090 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2015 17:24:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 66081 invoked by uid 89); 4 Aug 2015 17:24:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 17:24:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7758311D675; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 13:24:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 1FAqWmbgAQAb; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 13:24:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8282E11D677; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 13:24:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 16D35472E5; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:24:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 17:24:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Iain Buclaw Cc: GDB Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR 18669: Remove use of strtod in libiberty/d-demangle.c Message-ID: <20150804172415.GJ4777@adacore.com> References: <20150804170710.GF4777@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 > By the way, would this also be a candidate for the 7.10 branch? > Assume that upstream GCC respond in a timely manner. :-) It looks to me like this would only affect D support, and the patch seems innocent enough that, yes, it would be OK to push to the branch as well. We're still waiting for a couple of issues to be resolved (at least). So you still have a bit of time. I've found that libiberty changes are usually reviewed pretty quick, so hopefully you'll be OK. Ping me when I start talking about creating the release if necessary. -- Joel