From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 122022 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2015 17:18:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 122013 invoked by uid 89); 2 Jul 2015 17:18:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 17:18:43 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFC228EC2; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:18:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17T2sM9dZXnQ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:18:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C8628D00; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:18:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8BD14406C0; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 10:18:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 17:18:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Yao Qi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GDB 7.10 new branching date: Jun 29th, 2015 Message-ID: <20150702171839.GB3125@adacore.com> References: <20150601213709.GC2631@adacore.com> <20150615135805.GA28342@adacore.com> <86si96o8si.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86si96o8si.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 > When will we create the branch? How about today? There was one pending item, but it got moved to the "maybe" section of the 7.10 release TODO. So we should be good to go. I was really hoping that the patch issuing a warning when a discrepancy between objfile being loaded in memory and actual executable being debug is detected would make it... I'm wondering where we are at with this one! -- Joel