From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Subject: [commit] [patch] debug compile: Replace confusing debug message
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 06:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150702060320.GA9214@host1.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150701141703.GA20031@host1.jankratochvil.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 370 bytes --]
On Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:17:03 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:10:22 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > It'd be nice to have a comment here mentioning why we need to do this.
>
> I do not know, I think it is a GCC bug, with -mcmodel=large I have no idea why
> GCC needs _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_. I can write there this info.
Checked in as attached.
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 3332 bytes --]
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] debug compile: Replace confusing debug message
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 08:01:35 +0200
It was found that from
(gdb) set debug compile 1
(gdb) compile code 1
[...]
allocated 0x7f bytes at 0x7ffff7ff9000 prot 5
allocated 0x38 bytes at 0x7ffff7ff8000 prot 1
lookup undefined ELF symbol "_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_"
allocated 0x10 bytes at 0x7ffff7ff7000 for registers
(gdb) _
the message 'lookup undefined ELF symbol' looks as an error to people,
including to myself once.
Change it to:
allocated 0x7f bytes at 0x7ffff7ff9000 prot 5
allocated 0x38 bytes at 0x7ffff7ff8000 prot 1
ELF symbol "_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_" relocated to zero
allocated 0x10 bytes at 0x7ffff7ff7000 for registers
(gdb) _
gdb/ChangeLog
2015-07-02 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* compile/compile-object-load.c (compile_object_load): Replace debug
message "lookup undefined ELF symbol" by 3 more specific messages.
---
gdb/ChangeLog | 5 +++++
gdb/compile/compile-object-load.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index 38a1633..249181d 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2015-07-02 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+
+ * compile/compile-object-load.c (compile_object_load): Replace debug
+ message "lookup undefined ELF symbol" by 3 more specific messages.
+
2015-07-01 Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
* rl78-tdep.c (struct gdbarch_tdep): Add new field, rl78_psw_type.
diff --git a/gdb/compile/compile-object-load.c b/gdb/compile/compile-object-load.c
index 2b29b8b..8298748 100644
--- a/gdb/compile/compile-object-load.c
+++ b/gdb/compile/compile-object-load.c
@@ -731,14 +731,18 @@ compile_object_load (const char *object_file, const char *source_file,
if (sym->flags != 0)
continue;
- if (compile_debug)
- fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
- "lookup undefined ELF symbol \"%s\"\n",
- sym->name);
sym->flags = BSF_GLOBAL;
sym->section = bfd_abs_section_ptr;
if (strcmp (sym->name, "_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_") == 0)
{
+ if (compile_debug)
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
+ "ELF symbol \"%s\" relocated to zero\n",
+ sym->name);
+
+ /* It seems to be a GCC bug, with -mcmodel=large there should be no
+ need for _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_. Together with -fPIE the data
+ remain PC-relative even with _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ as zero. */
sym->value = 0;
continue;
}
@@ -748,10 +752,21 @@ compile_object_load (const char *object_file, const char *source_file,
{
case mst_text:
sym->value = BMSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (bmsym);
+ if (compile_debug)
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
+ "ELF mst_text symbol \"%s\" relocated to %s\n",
+ sym->name,
+ paddress (target_gdbarch (), sym->value));
break;
case mst_text_gnu_ifunc:
sym->value = gnu_ifunc_resolve_addr (target_gdbarch (),
BMSYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (bmsym));
+ if (compile_debug)
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
+ "ELF mst_text_gnu_ifunc symbol \"%s\" "
+ "relocated to %s\n",
+ sym->name,
+ paddress (target_gdbarch (), sym->value));
break;
default:
warning (_("Could not find symbol \"%s\" "
--
2.1.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-02 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-01 12:20 Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-01 12:33 ` Phil Muldoon
2015-07-01 14:10 ` Pedro Alves
2015-07-01 14:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-07-02 6:03 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150702060320.GA9214@host1.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=pmuldoon@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox