From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 117554 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2015 15:26:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 117545 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jun 2015 15:26:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 15:26:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C3022CD826; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 15:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-44.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.44]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t55FQFBl015983 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Jun 2015 11:26:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 15:26:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Doug Evans Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches , Phil Muldoon Subject: Re: [obv] compile-print.exp: xfail->kfail for '@' GDB array operator Message-ID: <20150605152615.GA28520@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20150604193820.GA18453@host1.jankratochvil.net> <86d21ao5vw.fsf@gmail.com> <20150605124035.GA1995@host1.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00086.txt.bz2 On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 17:19:05 +0200, Doug Evans wrote: > the plan isn't to remove the "standard 'print' command", right? > [The print (output, etc.) commands would either use the builtin > support or compile print.] Sure GCC will probably never become a hard requirement for GDB. I think there could be: set compile print never = current state set compile print always = never use internal GDB evaluation set compile print preferred = first try GCC then GDB evaluation - IMO to be the default (as long as GCC is available) set compile print deferred = first try GDB then GCC evaluation But the setting above has never been implemented/posted/discussed. Jan