From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-123347-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 89888 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2015 13:24:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 89878 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jun 2015 13:24:58 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:24:57 +0000
Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26])	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7739FB7A96;	Fri,  5 Jun 2015 13:24:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-44.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.44])	by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t55DOqUW012329	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);	Fri, 5 Jun 2015 09:24:55 -0400
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 13:24:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [obv] compile-print.exp: xfail->kfail for '@' GDB array operator
Message-ID: <20150605132452.GA3376@host1.jankratochvil.net>
References: <20150604193820.GA18453@host1.jankratochvil.net> <86d21ao5vw.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <86d21ao5vw.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00082.txt.bz2

On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:34:43 +0200, Yao Qi wrote:
> If '@' is rejected in GCC,

BTW '@' was implemented in the GCC patch only under condition of being run by
GDB/libcc1.


> '@' isn't a valid operator for C language,

So even if the GCC patch was accepted '@' still would not be a valid operator
for C language; that is correct.


Jan