From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19131 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2015 12:05:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19112 invoked by uid 89); 1 Jun 2015 12:05:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:05:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E072DC8365; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 12:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-53.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.53]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t51C5Tef029187 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Jun 2015 08:05:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:05:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Yao Qi Cc: Andreas Schwab , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [commit] [PATCH] Fix wrong assertions Message-ID: <20150601120528.GA32183@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <87vbg1eg08.fsf@igel.home> <20150513140106.GB3023@host1.jankratochvil.net> <86bnh3pw61.fsf@gmail.com> <20150529113101.GA15460@host1.jankratochvil.net> <86382fpki0.fsf@gmail.com> <20150529141027.GA8159@host1.jankratochvil.net> <86twuroe55.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86twuroe55.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 13:35:02 +0200, Yao Qi wrote: > I am not a native English speaker, but I can't parse the comment. How > about "CALLERS + CALLEES equal to LENGTH in the case of self tail-call"? Used your comment part. > Otherwise, the patch is OK to me. Checked in: e0619de699ae6e86d8b93fa96a7668aef2e9636a Thanks, Jan