From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26271 invoked by alias); 16 May 2015 12:39:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 26259 invoked by uid 89); 16 May 2015 12:39:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 16 May 2015 12:39:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7AA48EA33 for ; Sat, 16 May 2015 12:39:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-27.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.27]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4GCdT51017618 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 16 May 2015 08:39:31 -0400 Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 12:39:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Phil Muldoon Subject: [commit] [PATCH v5 3/7] compile: Distribute scope, add scope_data Message-ID: <20150516123928.GB9862@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20150513201615.4051.5261.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20150513201641.4051.25871.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <55562383.2080106@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55562383.2080106@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00427.txt.bz2 On Fri, 15 May 2015 18:49:07 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 05/13/2015 09:16 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > It should be all sub-classed but AFAIK GDB does not require C++ compiler yet. > > Yes, it does not require C++ yet. > > (You know now, so no need to have that in the commit log.) That is not a valid reason why to delete that line but for too many reasons I do not think that matters to discuss it more. > OK. Checked in: 5c65b58a58a4c77b1ec38b4e31549aaa090b4845 Jan