From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 82197 invoked by alias); 15 May 2015 07:59:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 82188 invoked by uid 89); 15 May 2015 07:59:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 15 May 2015 07:59:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4F7xHdY029182 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 03:59:17 -0400 Received: from blade.nx (ovpn-116-66.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.66]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4F7xGdC004903 for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 03:59:16 -0400 Received: by blade.nx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6376026404C; Fri, 15 May 2015 08:59:15 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 07:59:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Descriptive subjects Message-ID: <20150515075915.GA14783@blade.nx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00374.txt.bz2 Hi all, May I ask that people send emails to this list with more descriptive subjects than, e.g., "Fix PR/12345". The numbers don't stick in my head even after I've seen them 20 times, so I have to look in all these emails to determine whether I need to read them. I'm sure I'm not alone. Just a friendly reminder, my intention isn't to shame anyone! Thanks, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/