From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 108993 invoked by alias); 12 May 2015 13:48:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 108984 invoked by uid 89); 12 May 2015 13:48:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 12 May 2015 13:48:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4CDmljW012963 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 12 May 2015 09:48:48 -0400 Received: from blade.nx (ovpn-116-110.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.110]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4CDmj6P008279; Tue, 12 May 2015 09:48:46 -0400 Received: by blade.nx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0F660263C96; Tue, 12 May 2015 14:48:42 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 13:48:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: Pedro Alves Cc: Doug Evans , gdb-patches , Philippe Waroquiers Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make only user-specified executable filenames sticky Message-ID: <20150512134842.GA17599@blade.nx> References: <20150505151448.GA1417@blade.nx> <1430907977-30605-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> <5551D7AD.8080500@redhat.com> <20150512111338.GA14968@blade.nx> <5551E0FF.8060408@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5551E0FF.8060408@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00272.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves wrote: > On 05/12/2015 12:13 PM, Gary Benson wrote: > > Pedro Alves wrote: > > > We don't have a command to get out of: > > > > > > "file wrong_program; attach PID" > > > > file wrong_program; file; attach PID > > That's different from what I was saying. That is, a command > to fix things up _after_ the attach. Ah, ok, sorry. A different question: is there any reason that we should not *always* set the executable file from whatever the running program is? Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/