From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2518 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2015 20:36:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2506 invoked by uid 89); 27 Apr 2015 20:36:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:36:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3RKaMAv030545 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:36:22 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-27.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.27]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3RKaJRY011620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Apr 2015 16:36:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:50:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Phil Muldoon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] compile: set debug compile: Display GCC driver filename Message-ID: <20150427203618.GA20234@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20150423203402.23140.92757.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <553E5646.8020708@redhat.com> <20150427164757.GA10548@host1.jankratochvil.net> <553E6F92.4020204@redhat.com> <20150427175213.GA12596@host1.jankratochvil.net> <553E85BA.8020107@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <553E85BA.8020107@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01020.txt.bz2 On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 20:53:46 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > "wrong" is subjective. This split is a conscious design decision, > that has advantages like insulating the debugger from compiler ICEs. I haven't looked it up now but IIRC that is not a "conscious design decision" but just a workaround of buggy GCC which cannot recover/re-run from compilation errors in the same instance. The ICE resistance was only a side-effect. Jan