From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 87439 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2015 12:24:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 87429 invoked by uid 89); 23 Apr 2015 12:24:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:24:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3NCODZF023076 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:24:13 -0400 Received: from host1.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-27.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.27]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3NCO9cn028285 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:24:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:24:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Phil Muldoon Subject: Re: [PATCH] compile: Use libcc1.so->libcc1.so.0 Message-ID: <20150423122408.GA6924@host1.jankratochvil.net> References: <20150421213616.14023.38329.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <5538DA94.6080704@redhat.com> <20150423115236.GB5959@host1.jankratochvil.net> <5538E05D.2060103@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5538E05D.2060103@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00876.txt.bz2 On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:06:53 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > Yes, if the versions are compatible, and if the version is recorded in > a field in the returned context structure, then will even be simpler to just > return the highest version compatible, than my suggestion of having gdb > try both v1 and fallback to v0, which can be left for when we decide to make > a vN+1 that is not compatible with vN. This is just like duck typing. OK, so I will implement both compatibility (1) and (2) according to this scheme. Thanks, Jan