From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29794 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2015 14:31:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29778 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2015 14:31:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:31:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FB6D3A76; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:31:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Yx-GAtPgZQC4; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:31:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC09BD3A56; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:31:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 67ACD40EAD; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:31:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: 3 weeks to GDB 7.9.1 release? Message-ID: <20150422143120.GJ4764@adacore.com> References: <20150422133231.GB4764@adacore.com> <83y4lk2ria.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83y4lk2ria.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00824.txt.bz2 > Not really blocking, but would someone please help me get these > annoyances fixed upstream, so that I don't need to continue fixing > them in every GDB release? > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2015-03/msg00115.html IIUC (quick read only), you need libiberty patches to be pushed? libiberty is owned by GCC, and so such pushes should just be pushed to GCC's SVN first, and then can be backported to binutils-gdb... Do you have SVN write access to GCC? -- Joel