From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 130893 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2015 15:25:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 130879 invoked by uid 89); 20 Apr 2015 15:25:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:25:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CA41164AC; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:25:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 3IVYFj-qZuyJ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:25:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18DC116458; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:25:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2FE5940EAD; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:25:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:25:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Doug Evans Cc: "Tedeschi, Walfred" , Andreas Schwab , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: RFC: "set" command with 2 arguments instead of one? Message-ID: <20150420152533.GA4764@adacore.com> References: <20141123042417.GA839@adacore.com> <87bnny45zi.fsf@igel.home> <20141123095317.GE5774@adacore.com> <20141124071258.GI5774@adacore.com> <20150414124920.GH4704@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00744.txt.bz2 > gdb is never going to be at a point where all commands can use buildargv. > I think choosing either buildargv or commas (using parse_to_comma_and_eval > or whatever) should consider what the arguments to the command are. > And since this command takes things that are more like expressions > than like strings, I'm leaning towards commas. OK with me. -- Joel