From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 36599 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2015 12:09:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 36588 invoked by uid 89); 15 Apr 2015 12:09:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:09:53 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3FC9pA8030360 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:09:51 -0400 Received: from blade.nx (ovpn-116-95.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.95]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3FC9oTw002830; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:09:50 -0400 Received: by blade.nx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 93C1F263FB7; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:09:49 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 12:09:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: Pedro Alves Cc: Doug Evans , gdb-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark object files with "target:" filenames as OBJF_NONLOCAL_FILENAME Message-ID: <20150415120949.GA23948@blade.nx> References: <1428952063-2121-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> <552E27D2.9020808@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <552E27D2.9020808@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00558.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves wrote: > On 04/14/2015 12:27 AM, Doug Evans wrote: > > IOW, how about having an "is non-local" predicate that is invoked on > > the path whenever needed? > > [it could be the current "is_target_filename" or if you wanted to add > > a layer of abstraction that might be ok, depending on how this might > > evolve] > > I agree, for now is_target_filename seems good. I mailed a version 2 of this patch this morning, with that change: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-04/msg00547.html Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/