From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 41715 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2015 16:51:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 41703 invoked by uid 89); 6 Apr 2015 16:51:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.gentoo.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 06 Apr 2015 16:51:05 +0000 Received: from vapier (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA74A340A08; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 16:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 16:51:00 -0000 From: Mike Frysinger To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sim: d10v: fix signal updates Message-ID: <20150406165103.GO16816@vapier> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1428021615-5109-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <55227556.1050105@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YyxzkC/DtE3JUx8+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55227556.1050105@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 --YyxzkC/DtE3JUx8+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 598 On 06 Apr 2015 13:00, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 04/03/2015 01:40 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > @@ -936,17 +936,14 @@ sim_resume (SIM_DESC sd, int step, int siggnal) > > { > > case 0: > > break; > > -#ifdef SIGBUS > > - case SIGBUS: > > -#endif > > - case SIGSEGV: > > + case GDB_SIGNAL_BUS: >=20 > OOC, why no SIGSEGV -> GDB_SIGNAL_SEGV ? there probably is no good reason. this particular update matches what the = other=20 signal handling point update did (it normalized BUS & SEGV into BUS). i ca= n see=20 about updating both to handle SEGV & BUS independently. -mike --YyxzkC/DtE3JUx8+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVIrl3AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBi80P/0EqpsHwhoscy4Rh9mlvmelP 5+NRRnjslVfk+cZn2ZReqZhI059uUdQXbk8hgWSb+Zf9XgxCjKpDxbMB1d9Uu5ON OKXvw61CP/Tk+PXj4eULnQhJndDS6gVnbZXGOnlzmrHsl97Bmo5ytHNd3c0Ioh+9 0KOetalhwU6IWjFGDDecVd5wfXUdwErF0kFbmq8xO/lzBpkS5v1cJ+Q02QjFKFWx FbDSDd7Rxmsc96EywH1irIZ9AswGLNCJJwlTOURuOcMVSQuiehkByhCfi4GfoH2A gEhEvGmhAjRwn1WnpKeuQ2AyLAJkNaUjWf9TQ1Si0sGKU8NyGXjaavj4jbUosVlH 0ELt5ltVH2MvNuNSG+S9O7NXTMwGDTPtawtGumjJt3Lpbb7yMUYjmtvkCjXDiN/e 4El9V37QHqlvjRBAs8Epj/fbX29cthmGjcE9C/REEfNBdyr/kNCzuDD0BQi3dwv3 b1JV3EkUq0RV8YuSDG6n3WfitOmvBdJs9xgEwrmQ17QB9vUPyqzaPIkNTJQvPZXn J18jjrU5dWu7ErEqhwEf5TwE0rDXrNWqqgMHOY5uaDFJ1xoe796PeayMYv7Zrj2I KHv0MXorYIQH69MTG3qQuLA/c7f2P2R1qfryoYnS5Zs6M9xo2VcYxyxIykzVUItq hSZibYIXrkm7n99dtxD5 =s6xC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YyxzkC/DtE3JUx8+--