On 20 Mar 2015 11:50, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > > > 2015-03-19  James Bowman  <james.bowman@ftdichip.com>
> > > > 
> > > >         * sim-ft32.h: New file, FT32 simulator/GDB interface.
> > > 
> > > Shouldn't this part of the "sim" patch? (which means that the GDB
> > > part would be conditional on the "sim" part being pushed first).
> > 
> > only gdb uses this header to interface with the sim directly, so it could go 
> > either way
> 
> Doesn't the sim need that header too - I would think the point of
> having the definitions be there would be to make sure that sim and
> GDB are in sync?

the sim currently duplicates the defines, but it prob should include it directly
-mike