From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26181 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2015 15:50:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 26163 invoked by uid 89); 20 Mar 2015 15:50:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 15:50:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6B6D375E; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:50:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NmYO-+uu+5nE; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:50:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFFFD36A3; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:50:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 20E5040EAD; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:50:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 15:50:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: James Bowman , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH, FT32] gdb and sim support Message-ID: <20150320155053.GB5273@adacore.com> References: <20150224045154.GE13523@vapier> <20150317173615.GC7494@adacore.com> <20150319185452.GA14215@vapier> <20150320124600.GA5273@adacore.com> <20150320154715.GI11803@vapier> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150320154715.GI11803@vapier> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00631.txt.bz2 > > > 2015-03-19 James Bowman > > > > > > * sim-ft32.h: New file, FT32 simulator/GDB interface. > > > > Shouldn't this part of the "sim" patch? (which means that the GDB > > part would be conditional on the "sim" part being pushed first). > > only gdb uses this header to interface with the sim directly, so it could go > either way Doesn't the sim need that header too - I would think the point of having the definitions be there would be to make sure that sim and GDB are in sync? -- Joel