On 20 Mar 2015 10:28, Nicholas Clifton wrote:
> >>    Tested with no regressions on an rl78-elf toolchain.
> >
> > how do you really know when there are no sim tests ?
> 
> Because I use the sim to help run the gcc testsuite, and without this 
> patch several gcc tests were failing due to errors from the sim about 
> misaligned accesses to the MDB register.  With this patch those failures 
> went away and no new failures were introduced.  Hence I felt confident 
> that the patch was good.

OK.  it would be nice if there were at least one minor sim test though.
it's dirt simple to add one written in just assembly ...

i have found directed sim tests to be better than gcc in the long run.
-mike