From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13859 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2015 13:46:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13848 invoked by uid 89); 19 Feb 2015 13:46:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:46:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF83F1166E3; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:46:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id SjAgekmurCNI; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:46:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75054116663; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:46:03 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A4E0E40EAD; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:46:04 +0400 (RET) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:46:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: gdb-7.9-release tag on wrong commit Message-ID: <20150219134604.GH23529@adacore.com> References: <1424347460-31023-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <20150219122319.GF23529@adacore.com> <20150219124010.GG23529@adacore.com> <8338623w96.fsf@gnu.org> <54E5DD70.3060005@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54E5DD70.3060005@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00537.txt.bz2 > > Wouldn't it be even more confusing to have 7.9.1 without 7.9? > > > > I'd say creating a new tag is good enough. > > Agreed. > > To minimize confusion, you can also delete the bad tag, and > then most people won't ever see it. Those who managed to > pull in the bad tag in can get rid of it with > e.g., "git pull --prune --tags". I would have documented it in both NEWS and website, but deleting the tag is indeed a good idea. I will create a new one momentarily. Thanks for your feedback. -- Joel