From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24294 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2015 11:21:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24275 invoked by uid 89); 17 Feb 2015 11:21:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 11:21:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E341163DF; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 06:21:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id AHiA0HirZmZt; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 06:21:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E851163DE; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 06:21:44 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0E04440EAD; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:21:44 +0400 (RET) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 11:21:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: ready GDB 7.9 release? Message-ID: <20150217112144.GC23529@adacore.com> References: <20150127043704.GB4697@adacore.com> <20150129045344.GC5193@adacore.com> <54D0DA28.9080500@redhat.com> <20150204041129.GN4525@adacore.com> <54D1C3E6.5030109@redhat.com> <20150205055541.GD4738@adacore.com> <20150217103440.GA10992@adacore.com> <54E322C2.8050503@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54E322C2.8050503@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00431.txt.bz2 > Would it be OK to merge in the fixes for: > > [Pedro] (Fix racy FAILs of sigall-reverse.exp (and more)) > > Now in master, gaining additional exposure. Need to decide whether to push to branch or not based on that. > > to the branch? The series has been on master since 3 Feb, and > I'm not aware of any related regression. I'll do it today if OK. > > (Although exposed by sigall-reverse.exp first, this affects any > "query" done while the target is installed in the event loop.) Sounds good, please go ahead! -- Joel