From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11799 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2015 17:54:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10561 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jan 2015 17:51:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:51:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0PHpqXM021278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:51:52 -0500 Received: from blokker.wildebeest.org (ovpn-116-62.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.62]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0PHppk7022503 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:51:52 -0500 Received: by blokker.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B3B032073F; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:51:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 19:52:00 -0000 From: Mark Wielaard To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove testsuite compile errors with GCC5. Message-ID: <20150125175150.GA22039@blokker.redhat.com> References: <1422201321-19224-1-git-send-email-mjw@redhat.com> <201501251627.t0PGRG9Y020242@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201501251627.t0PGRG9Y020242@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00681.txt.bz2 On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 05:27:17PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > From: Mark Wielaard > > Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:55:21 +0100 > > > > GCC5 defaults to the GNU11 standard for C and warns by default for > > implicit function declarations and implicit return types. > > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html > > > > Fixing these issues in the testsuite turns 9 untested and 17 unsupported > > testcases into 417 new passes when compiling with GCC5. > > Looks like none of these intentionally omitted prototypes. Fine with > me. Thanks, pushed.