Re: [PATCH 0/2] Make chained function calls in expressions work

Siva Chandra
2014-10-23T23:31:09Z

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> In this case, I agree with the rest of your explanation. Please add a
> comment in the final version of the patch that explains why the extra
> copy is necessary.
>
> There's just one minor change I think would be good: can we allocate that
> extra copy on the stack at least only for *class* types, then? I'd prefer
> to avoid this for the common case of routines just returning a scalar.

I will soon send a new version of the patch with all the suggested
changes in this thread.

Thanks,
Siva Chandra