From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25171 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2014 08:58:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25053 invoked by uid 89); 7 Oct 2014 08:58:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:58:03 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s978w2ut016308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 04:58:02 -0400 Received: from blade.nx (ovpn-116-100.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.100]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s978w1kB014200 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 04:58:01 -0400 Received: by blade.nx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 13F1C262681; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:53:16 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:58:00 -0000 From: Gary Benson To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [PING PATCH 0/3] Rationalize cleanups/exceptions includes Message-ID: <20141007085315.GA18752@blade.nx> References: <1409586154-16196-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1409586154-16196-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2 Hi all, This one's been sitting for over a month now. The three patches are linked here: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-09/msg00021.html Is this ok to commit? Thanks, Gary Gary Benson wrote: > Hi all, > > This morning I noticed that GDB's utils.h includes cleanups.h and > exceptions.h, meaning all GDB .c files include these files. Since > gdbserver/server.h does similar (albeit with common-exceptions.h) I > decided to move cleanups.h and common-exceptions.h to common-defs.h > to make it clearer that these files are included everywhere. > > Checked by building on RHEL 6.5 x86_64. > > Ok to commit? > > Thanks, > Gary > > -- > http://gbenson.net/